08-02-2018, 02:12 PM
Hi _Aka_,
With spotting I was refering to the volume spot generator element, in the tutorial this seems to be used to place the rail sleepers
As an example what I want to achieve:
Track:![[Image: medium.jpg]](https://d2t1xqejof9utc.cloudfront.net/screenshots/pics/c2f91cdcf62d38f93ad0ad4d424f523f/medium.jpg)
Switch:![[Image: 40208007.jpg]](http://static.panoramio.com/photos/original/40208007.jpg)
But it is possible to not generate rails for the area that the switch occupies but still have the spline be a closed loop with a connection for the branch?
As for the placement, the idea is to trace a blueprint so it is going to be a manual labor thing hence the question.
Any way thanks for the confidence so far! I think this is exactly what I need.
With spotting I was refering to the volume spot generator element, in the tutorial this seems to be used to place the rail sleepers
As an example what I want to achieve:
Track:
![[Image: medium.jpg]](https://d2t1xqejof9utc.cloudfront.net/screenshots/pics/c2f91cdcf62d38f93ad0ad4d424f523f/medium.jpg)
Switch:
![[Image: 40208007.jpg]](http://static.panoramio.com/photos/original/40208007.jpg)
But it is possible to not generate rails for the area that the switch occupies but still have the spline be a closed loop with a connection for the branch?
As for the placement, the idea is to trace a blueprint so it is going to be a manual labor thing hence the question.
Any way thanks for the confidence so far! I think this is exactly what I need.

